We scan public GitHub Issues for recurring requests, workflow friction and missing capabilities—then rank the strongest signals without hiding the original evidence.
56 signals · Last data refresh Sep 25, 2026, 8:54 PM UTC
“New” means first detected by the Radar within 48 hours. Live opportunities come only from projects in the current curated feed; archived projects remain searchable as historical research but cannot leave stale demand signals here.
A popular Issue can reveal real friction, but it does not prove willingness to pay. Use these leads for interviews, validation and product discovery.
Use the evidence as a starting point, then verify the problem before building.
Observed in langchain-ai/social-media-agent · TypeScript · MIT
What the reporter described: Only anthropic is supported as of now Is there any plans on supporting other llms
Related friction appears in 8 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.
The evidence score combines capped, diminishing-return discussion, positive reactions, unresolved duration and the underlying project’s Radar Score. This prevents one repeatedly commented thread from overwhelming independent signals. Maintenance-only tickets, dependency dashboards, CI failures and release checklists are filtered out. Rankings are independent and never paid placements.