← Back to Opportunity Radar
GUIDED VALIDATION BRIEF

`gemini-3.5-flash` not working in the gemini cli why?

Evidence observed in google-gemini/gemini-cli, a Coding project.

21 comments25 positive reactions129 days openProject Radar 97
priority/p2area/agentstatus/bot-triagedkind/bug
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
DEMAND CONFIDENCE

REPEATED ACROSS 8 PROJECTS

Related friction appears in 8 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.

Project strength and demand confidence are measured separately.
SOURCE EVIDENCE

Start with what users actually said

Reporter context: What would you like to be added? Why is this needed? gemini-3.5-flash is released Additional context No responseExcerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.

Read original GitHub Issue ↗
CODING VALIDATION LENS

Recruit: Recruit contributors who can replay the problem in a representative repository and development environment.

Guardrail: Use a fixed test case and compare completion, regressions and recovery against the unchanged baseline.

01 · Provider interoperability

Write the problem hypothesis

For [developer], completing [setup or development task] is unclear at [step], causing [abandonment or rework].

You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.
02 · EVIDENCE INTERVIEW

Interview five developers or engineering leads

  • Screen-share the task without guidance.
  • Where do you first hesitate?
  • What did you search for?
  • Which error or concept is unclear?
  • What workaround finally unblocked you?
At least three people independently describe the same painful workflow with recent examples.
03 · MINIMUM TEST

Run the smallest experiment

Create the smallest example, diagnostic or setup assistant and observe three developers using it unprompted.

Three developers finish the task with fewer interventions or measurably less time.Use a fixed test case and compare completion, regressions and recovery against the unchanged baseline.
04 · DECISION GATE

Make a build decision

  • Build: repeated pain and active commitment
  • Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
  • Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Do not let GitHub engagement replace direct validation.

Why this brief exists

Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.