Write the problem hypothesis
For [specific user], completing [job] is difficult because [missing capability], causing [measurable consequence].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.[FEAT] For opencode, could we have a option of instead of choosing model for team members, choosing agent for each team members.
Evidence observed in 777genius/agent-teams-ai, a Coding project.
3 comments1 positive reactions57 days openProject Radar 91
enhancement
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SUPPORTED ISSUE
This Issue has some independent public support. Treat it as a focused validation lead, not proof of a market.
Project strength and demand confidence are measured separately.SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: Summary So currently, as the docs shows(and my understanding, correct me if I understand wrong), is to manually select the models for the team members, but for some opencode user like me, the opencode extension Oh-My-Openagent had extended numbers of type of agent for opencode. So, What I want, is to instead only can…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Recruit: Recruit contributors who can replay the problem in a representative repository and development environment.
Guardrail: Use a fixed test case and compare completion, regressions and recovery against the unchanged baseline.
Interview five developers or engineering leads
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Run the smallest experiment
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.Use a fixed test case and compare completion, regressions and recovery against the unchanged baseline.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.